Pages

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

Contesting Boundaries: Migration - the defiant search for success in today's Africa


AYENKA FRANKLIN
MASTERS IN SOCIAL SCIENCES AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Demographic Politics, Migration and Development in Africa


Content
1.      Introduction
2.      Why do people defy boundaries
3.      Objectives of the study
4.      Theoretical underpinnings
5.      Methodology
6.      observations
7.      Analysis of information
8.      The results
9.      Conclusion
1.  Bibliography


Introduction
The continued liberalization of world trade, the movement of goods and capital by which this is measured, and the devastating effects of war on humanity has been matched by a spectacular movement of persons in a defiant search for success and security. Hence there is a consequent decline in the control power of the nation-state over population movement as migrants struggle to resist state oppression because they feel excluded from the opportunity to improve their livelihoods or are threatened by violence conflicts. This has been described today as a new “age of migration” print and visual media.
The defiant search for success is about how migrants defy national and international law in their search for success and security through their different activities as they find themselves excluded from opportunity and tend to transgress boundaries of the law to commit illegal activities.[1] The study Paris-Congo by two experienced anthropologists examines the world of informal commerce between Europe and Africa, particularly as carried out by traders from Kinshasa and Brazzaville through their personal networks centered in Paris. Faced with disorder and economic breakdown in their home countries, these enterprising men and women have found ways to evade the normal rules of travel and exchange to exploit opportunities to supply niche markets in Europe's immigrant communities. By recording and analyzing life histories, the authors show how traders construct and organize their businesses, build on relationships of trust with family, friends, and members of their ethnic groups, and ultimately develop identities that provide meaning, status, and zest in their precarious lives. A fascinating look at the underside of globalization and what the authors call the counter-hegemonic perspective of “debrouillez-vous” (fend for yourself) among those excluded from the world of "legitimate" commerce is central to this work. Due to the difficulties in accessing visas, these migrant traders use route and survive in ways that are rough and mind boggling.[2] This article responds to questions centered on those who do not and will not accept exclusion from opportunity and fend for themselves with the will to succeed in spite of the constraints of national and international authority that lose sight of the fruition or returns of such ventures on local communities or places of origins of the traders.
1.      Why Do People Defy Boundaries
Among the various models attempting to explain why migration from Africa to Europe and elsewhere in search for better lives in spite of the restraints put in place by governments and international agencies. The four approaches which can be used are the following:
a.                   Neoclassical economics in Europe and Africa (Macro and Micro). Macro theory views geographic differences in the supply and demand for labor in origin and destination countries as the major factors driving individual migration decisions. The economic difference of the two distinct geographical regions of Congo and Paris encourages the defiance of national boundaries in search for success.
b.                  Neoclassical micro economic theory focuses on the level of individual rational actors such as the numerous sub-Saharan Africans who make decisions to migrate based upon a cost-benefit calculation that indicates a positive net return to movement. And in this case it is the returns from trade even though it might be illegal.
c.                   Dual labor market theory holds that demand for low-level workers in more developed economies such as Western Europe, is the critical factor shaping migration from sub-Saharan Africa to Europe.
d.                  World systems theory focuses not on labor markets in national economies, but on the structure of the world market; notably the "penetration of capitalist economic relations into peripheral, non-capitalist societies," which takes place through the concerted actions of neocolonial governments, multinational firms, and national elites.
The questions here are how do these approaches influence the defiant search for success by Africans in Europe and in communities far away from theirs? What kind of activities do they determine to carry out to assure their success? Most often the activities of most migrants as posited by the author of the article are more often illegal trade. So, why is this type of trade considered a resistance and who or what exactly are they resisting? The answers these questions are childishly simple from the author’s point of view. The activities of traders in search for success constitute smuggling which is an act of rebellion against political and economic systems and the dominant groups.
2.      Objectives Of The Article
The objectives of the study are mainly:
                     To examine the degree and extent of transnational migration and trade from Africa to Europe by combining the high standards and frank reality that has characterized the series of meticulous and illuminating empirical case studies.
                     To identify the categories and nature of transmigrating traders from Africa and their type of trade which defies national boundaries in the name of success;
                     To determine the typologies of migrants and trade from Africa;
                     To examine the impact of traders defying boundaries in their endless search for success on Africa and receiving countries.
3.      Problematic/ Theoretical Underpinnings
Scholars of transnational thesis have identified five major characteristics of trans-nationalism which when compared with the study immigrants supports the transnational thesis. First, among trans-migrants, there is a high frequency and intensity of exchange, diverse modes of transaction, and multiplicity of activities that lead to travel and contacts ,
This study found that immigrants travel to their home countries and back, which involves an increasingly high intensity of exchange of goods between Europe and their home countries
Second, transnational activities are tied into the expansion and internationalization of capitalist production[3]. The argument sees the increase demand for cheap labor in the north, facilitated by improvement in communication and technology, especially in menial jobs in the service sectors of urban areas as lead causes attracting Southern workers to economies of urban North.[4]  note that, “It is this thick web of regular and instantaneous communication and travel that we encounter today that differentiates trans-nationalism from the otherwise ad-hoc and less frequent back and forth movement of migrants of the past”. Even though this study shows an opposite direction of mainstream migration from Africa to Europe, the postulated African–European flow of migrants is synonymous with movements from less developed to more developed regions.
Third, trans-nationalism should be interpreted as new ways of understanding and interpreting migrants’ identities. The argument is, traditional migrants would abandon their identities and adopt new ones, what Crush and McDonald described as “casting of the old and absorbing the new”. This is best explained by the assimilation hypothesis. Trans-nationalism has rendered such hypothesis anachronistic. For transnational migrants, identity is a hybrid in which they take on multiple identities, including a combination of home and host countries. Transnational migrants understand that successes in host country depend on preserving their identity and adopting new ones, not abandoning their home identity (socio-cultural and linguistic traits).
Based on the cumulative theory of transnational migration, the fourth feature of trans-nationalism considers migration as an interactive process that becomes increasingly independent of the conditions that caused it (Massey et al, 1994; 1998). This feature fits the study immigrants when considering their knowledge, experiences, social contacts, interactions, networks, and their changing asylum motives. c.           Cumulative causation theory holds that, by altering the social context of subsequent migration decisions, the establishment of international migration streams creates "feedback" that makes additional movements more likely. Among the factors affected by migration are the distribution of income and land; the organization of agricultural production; the values and cultural perceptions surrounding migration; the regional distribution of human capital; and the "social labeling" of jobs in destination areas as "immigrant jobs." Again, once a "migration system" has developed, it is often resistant to government policy intervention.
Finally, new cultural strategies of adaptation, the sheer size and diversity of migrants’ communities, new technologies of communication and transportation offer new modes of resistance to exploitation and discrimination of migrants. The study results show that xenophobia, affirmative action policy, and discrimination have forced migrants to set up their own social order. Immigrants in the study resist xenophobia, discrimination and exploitation in many ways. They adapt to the socio-cultural modes[5]  in Europe.
Therefore, to fight this social ill that circles them out from opportunity Africans migrate to Europe and engage in trading and other business activities. Interviews with immigrants suggest profit maximization as their ultimate goal. Findings further show that immigrant business owners who based their transactions on the basis of more accurate assessments of immigrants gain a competitive advantage over the majority of Europeans who are more blinded by prejudice. Entrepreneurial members of immigrants’ communities in the study take advantage for economic gains by employing and managing qualified but discriminated immigrants. For these immigrants their ultimate goal is profit maximization. Interviews suggest and attribute the successes of immigrants’ fruit and vegetable shops.
4.      Methodology
The strength of the work is in ethnographic detail and argument. "Congo-Paris" is a fine example of the recent trend in anthropology away from the localized study of communities and towards analysis that transcends geographic boundaries. Not that this study is "multi-sited" (to use the dominant buzzword): MacGaffey and Bazenguissa conducted their fieldwork for the book entirely in Paris, interviewing dozens of subjects from both Congo-Brazzaville and Congo-Kinshasa. But Paris is just one venue in these transnational subjects' life histories as they range back and forth across national, legal, commercial, and cultural frontiers. It investigates the transnational trade between Central Africa and Europe by focusing on the lives of individual traders from Kinshasa and Brazzaville who operate across national frontiers and often outside the law. Challenging the boundaries of traditional anthropology
This book is a highly successful and creative collaboration between Janet MacGaffey, an anthropologist who has studied the "second economy" in the Congo for many years; Remy Bazenguissa-Ganga, a sociologist who has studied and published on "la sape"; and a dedicated research assistant, himself a trader and sapeur. Since the traders work on the margins of the law and are highly mobile, they are a challenging population to study. A pivotal methodological issue is trust. For six months, primarily in Paris in 1994, the researchers gained the traders' trust and followed the lives of some twenty individuals, about half of whom were "sapeurs." Using network analysis, they show how “sapeurs” construct connections that extend through time, space, and culture, as they circulate commodities between countries. MacGaffey and Bazenguissa-Ganga elucidate the organization of the trade, how it can function in the absence of a supportive legal system, and how traders find opportunities to avoid oppressive constraints by operating outside state laws
While the authors set out to validate the Congolese quest for relief from political and economic hardship at home, the image they present of this loosely-defined community of traders will do nothing for its image abroad. These individuals define themselves through the act of quietly circumventing the rules (particularly import duties and immigration laws), resisting governmental authority without manifesting any visible signs of dissent. This is understandable, given the corrupt and authoritarian Congolese regimes of recent decades. But the transnational traders' ethos of stealthy noncompliance extends to their overseas existence as well, with the result in these Parisian cases being a gamut of criminal activity from smuggling and apartment squatting to drug dealing and theft. "Model immigrants" they are not, regardless of whether their behavior represents a survival strategy. One wonders just how representative this underworld is of the larger community of Congolese living in Paris, and whether those Congolese living more lawful existences there object to being tarred with this brush of illegality.

5.      Observation
Such moral qualms aside, I give "Congo-Paris" high marks for its thorough and penetrating analysis of its subjects, a very difficult group to interview given its members' legal status and clandestine activities. No doubt its success owes much to the collaboration between MacGaffey (British) and Bazenguissa (Congolese). The book also skillfully negotiates the difficult and shifting theoretical territory of anthropology to bring outside perspectives to bear on its subjects. Finally, it makes a strong case for redefining anthropology in the context of ongoing processes of globalization. I suspect that we will be seeing a good many more studies like this one in the future
Chapter 5 which is the bases of this work entitled “Contesting boundaries: the Defiant Search for success” richly describes how personal relations work as an impressive illustration of the vigour of coping in the most daunting conditions of economic and political collapse. The norm of reciprocity informs the structures and values traders use. The authors show how customary emphasis on redistributing wealth among kin puts unique pressures on the traders and how traders interpret occupational mishaps and personal illness as consequences of their actions. This fascinating book explores a neglected topic in African studies: petty transnational illegal trade between central Africa and Europe. The book is unusual in at least three ways. First, it is concerned with the informal sector, focused as it is on the commercial activities of young traders who seek their 'fortune' by setting up links between France and Africa. Second, it discusses in some detail the question of African identity as it evolves in the course of such a long bi-continental roving existence. Finally, it examines the relationship between seemingly insignificant trading activities and the evolution of globalization - as it applies to Africa based on a relatively new form of anthropological research.
6.      Analysis  of information
The study’s findings show that people who cheat the state or break its laws feel that, since their leaders steal the state’s goods, they can do the same; they say “if the authorities want us to stop, they must stop stealing the state’s goods themselves.”[6] They then defy the boundaries of the law, by carrying out unlicensed trade. Discussions with immigrants show preferences to continue in a similar job or get better-paid jobs in Europe than engaging in small business activities. An immigrant tuck-shop owner explains further: “I was a professional teacher in Cameroon but because I don’t have a teaching or any other better job, I have to open this shop to sustain my family.” The majority of immigrants in the study explained similarly, noting that lack of jobs give them little option outside engaging in small business ventures. The succeeding section examines some immigrant business activities and trade. 
7.      The results: Contesting boundaries and surviving outside the law
Shaw (2001) traces and blames the origin of West African criminal networks in Europe on corruption of state functionaries, rapid technological changes and the collapse of the nation state. Kihato and Landau (2006) argue that migrants’ search for autonomy from state efforts at regulation end up as part of the "uncaptured urbanite." While immigrant criminal activities are not limited to the "uncaptured urbanite," the argument here is that immigrants are forced into criminality largely even though not entirely to ‘West-a-phobia’. While there is no crime free-society, the disturbing aspect of crime in South Africa is the violent nature of the crime itself.
Different sociological views: strain, interactionist, radical and control, best explained the causes of crime in society. But in France the situation is unique with complex combinations of different sociological explanations. Such complexity of crime appears to explain why the country has become a target of major international crime syndicates, and an attractive location for money laundering and sophisticated fraud. More often these ills and odds are blamed on West Africans in South Africa. A Functionalist theorist like Durkheim for example, points out that crime is caused by increasing social strains which are inevitable, normal and ever increasing. Foucault notes that tighter and more meticulous law can result to increasing numbers of offenders. While the causes of crime in Paris are not of concern here, it however highlight on why some immigrants engage in activities outside the margins of the law. Findings suggest that criminal activities are survival options for discriminated and unemployed immigrants. Elsewhere, they are resistance practices common amongst the poor and the politically powerless; while others think it’s a ‘weapon’ of the poor. In this study, immigrants use terms like, “bush-faller”, and ‘Cam-air ’, to symbolize and justify their lifestyle geared at profit maximization. Similarly, immigrants in Paris use metaphors like “debrouiller” “l’aventure” and “to fend for oneself” to justify their actions. Metaphors and idioms symbolize a way of life geared towards self-realization and gratification, and are descriptions for improving oneself irrespective of the price (MacGaffey and Ganga, 2000). Immigrants contest boundaries for self-realization
Shaw argues that West African criminal groups without specific corporate structure or hierarchy are classic examples of criminal networks. While this is not to deny the existence of highly structured African criminal networks in Paris, the focus is more on loose immigrant networks and suggestive of their effectiveness in illegal business transactions.  Taxes and custom duties are legal boundaries transgressed by African immigrants.  Immigrants selling ethnic goods, and/or exporting goods from France, evade the payment of custom duties and related taxes. Hibou argues:
"Customs evasions or smuggling, then, cannot be considered in isolation as an activity which is simply illegal or criminal, but is better seen as one among a larger variety of techniques designed to exploit opportunities offered by the state and to gain access to the profits generated by operating between the local and international sectors."[7]
Immigrants’ connections and networks facilitate the transgression of taxes. Interview reports show that immigrants bring ethnic goods for sale in Europe.  To evade the payment of custom duties/taxes, the goods are declared as personal property and when they are sold, immigrants maximize profits. According to an immigrant, “When we bring or they send us foodstuff from home we use our connections to clear the goods and when we sell them we make reasonable profits”.

8.      Conclusions
To conclude, it is worth noting that the daily lives of the immigrants in the study depend on multiple and constant interconnections across international borders, with configured identities based on the realities in Europe and their home countries. Due to increasing levels of xenophobia, more and more immigrants are becoming trans-migrants to guarantee their survival as well as those of their family members at home. As observed: “Discrimination in Labour markets whether anticipated or perceptual discrimination creates additional incentives for self-employment including owner-operated businesses.”[8] Activities outside the margins of the law by discriminated immigrants are not uncommon. The cases of Congolese immigrants in Paris (Congo Paris) are well established and documented. For some immigrants, these activities are resistance practices for the marginalized while for others it is just a weapon of the poor. These practices call for the reconsideration of issues around immigration policies and the treatment of immigrants in Europe. However, this is not to say that France was a crime free society, since evidence abound that there are more horrendous crimes by the French. The economic potentials of immigrants in the country can be exploited to the benefits of the French economy if immigrants are provided with documentation, allowed to study and given employment. By so doing, will reduce the rate of immigrants’ activities beyond the margins of the law.

Citations 


[1] In Howard Berker’s book Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance tries to distinguish factors that cause a person to be labeled “deviant”. He argues that the term depends not only on the characteristics of the person so labeled  but also on the transaction of the labeled person and the society that labels him. So if the people in the study are labeled as defiant in the search for success, it is because their activities are not universally agreed upon and the disagreement over them are are part of the political process of the society in which they find themselves or their host society.   
[2] African Center for Applied Research and Training in Social Development(ACARTSOD). Expert group meeting on interntional migration and development in North Africa, Rabat and Morocco 19-20th march 2007. On “Migration and development in Africa.”
[3] Crush, J. and McDonald, D. A. (2002) ‘Transnationalism, African immigration, and new migrants space in South Africa: An introduction’, in J. Crush and D. A. McDonald (eds.), Transnationalism and New African Immigration to South Africa, Cape Town: Southern African Migration Project/Canadian Association of African Studies.
[4] Portes, A, Guarnizo, L. & Landolt, P. (1999), The Study of Transnationalism: Pitfalls and Promise of an Emergent Research Field. Ethnic and Racial Studies Vol. 22, 217-237.
[5] Dressing, hairstyles, gestures, make European friends,
[6] It is an extract from the document being analyzed where people say “les hommes politiques volent les bein de l’état. Nous emprenons ce terrain…”
[7] Hibou, B. (1999), ‘The ‘social capital’ of the state as an agent of deception: Or the ruses of economic intelligence’, in J. F. Bayart., S. Ellis and B. Hibou (eds.), The Criminalization of the State in Africa, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
[8] Sowell, T. (1981), Markets and Minorities, New York: Basic Books Inc. Publishers.



References 
  • African Center for Applied Research and Training in Social Development(ACARTSOD). Expert group meeting on interntional migration and development in North Africa, Rabat and Morocco 19-20th march 2007. On “Migration and development in Africa.”
  • Crush, J. and McDonald, D. A. (2002) ‘Transnationalism, African immigration, and new migrants space in South Africa: An introduction’, in J. Crush and D. A. McDonald (eds.), Transnationalism and New African Immigration to South Africa, Cape Town: Southern African Migration Project/Canadian Association of African Studies.
  • Hibou, B. (1999), ‘The ‘social capital’ of the state as an agent of deception: Or the ruses of economic intelligence’, in J. F. Bayart., S. Ellis and B. Hibou (eds.), The Criminalization of the State in Africa, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
  • Howard Berker’s book Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance
  • Portes, A, Guarnizo, L. & Landolt, P. (1999), The Study of Transnationalism: Pitfalls and Promise of an Emergent Research Field. Ethnic and Racial Studies Vol. 22, 217-237.
  • Sowell, T. (1981), Markets and Minorities, New York: Basic Books Inc. Publishers.

Saturday, November 19, 2016

Hate and Euphemistic Speech in Politics: Searching for a Durable Peace through words that Heal.



AYENKA FRANKLIN
MSc. Social Science and International Relations

Abstract
This article looks beyond the causes of conflict and violence. It suggests that the fire of violence and belligerence are not just ignited by the root causes of conflicts but by motivation through speech. If we could solve problems and heal wound before conflict entrepreneurs take center-stage and craft euphemistic and hate speeches that motivate people to pick up arms in violence, we would be halving all potentially dangerous conflicts even if they are entrenched in commonplace political, social and economic lives of individuals globally.

Key words: Hate speech, conflict, violence

I. Introduction
Human rights are the foundation of human dignity, freedom, justice and peace. Behind each right like the freedom of speech, there is more often than not a history, and too often a present of oppression. As such, they each play a role in the construction of our common humanity. People use thousands of words daily in spoken and written speech, but what words? In a rigorous language, there are no words of war or, for that matter, of peace. Any semantic can in opinion prompt the full scope of ideas, beliefs, and political activity. Any language can communicate war as well as communicate peace. Therefore "words of war" are no more than figures of speech or words crafted as ideas, rather than a special kind of dialectal, but it may be interpreted as fairly surface. The two most prominent features of war discourse are its belligerence and its vagueness. Their apparent absurdity disappears as soon as we become conscious of the difference in their dissemination: the antagonism is focused at an apparent enemy, while the evasion denotes the undertakings of one's own side.
Hate speech may be a widespread term for the voiced communication of hatred, bigotry, prejudice, and damaging shared feelings. It is a violent usage of language aimed to attack, isolate, judge and possibly destroy an ethnic, social or political group, which under disorder or chaos may even proclaim total physical annihilation. What exactly is the role of hate speech and propaganda in relation to extreme violence? Do words create a permissive environment for violence? Do words and speeches designed to incite violence move erstwhile non-violent people to commit acts of violence? Hate speech is a powerful rallying device to silence or remove opponents — often in preparations for violence or in the course of war, when hate speech assumes the leading role in orchestrating the rhetoric of war. By no means new, hate speech has been a tangible cause of major conflicts like racist propaganda of the Third Reich, language usage in the Rwandan Genocide and the bitter verbal exchanges of the Cold War. How can words of war and hate be chiseled into words of peace? First, we need to understand hate speech then, we can learn to transform it to words of love and peace.
II. Understanding of meaning of Hate Speech
Hate speech and propaganda occurs in all societies, to radically varying degrees and we have witnessed it with presidential candidate Donald Trump’s campaign for the White house. While the 1948 UN Genocide Convention criminalizes the incitement of genocide, especially with the use of hate speech as well as how to respond in such cases, it is fraught with contention. To help address the lack of sufficient research and documentation to distinguish how and when speech is understood broadly to include print media, radio, television, and new technologies, as well as public speaking in relation to the occurrence of violence,[1] the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum convened a seminar at which experts explored four contemporary case studies as well as international laws governing this area. Hate speech like “new speaks” in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty – Four is the falsification of reality through speech. It does not respects cultural and political differences, and reveals the cruelty of words as diffused by Radio Mille Collines in Rwanda in 1994 which demonized one group against another and built resentment and fear among the Hutu who planned the genocide as an appropriate self-defense mechanism.

III. The Index of hate speech
The full effects of hate speech are felt with the range of mass media. In most African countries, inter-ethnic hatred is expertly plotted by political and national elites in preparation for warfare and hostile takeovers.
Among the many resources on hate speech that have led to mass murder and violence is Simon Bikindi, a popular Rwandan singer and songwriter who song Twasezereye (we said goodbye to the Feudal Regime), Nanga Abahutu (I Hate the Hutu), and ―Bene Sebahinzi (The Sons and Fathers of the Cultivators).[2] These songs were filled with inflammatory anti Tutsi hate speech and pro-Hutu solidarity messages. Nevertheless, the Kenyan election of 2008 is compared to a political transformations that witnessed hateful speech and extreme violence. Violence in Kenya was predominantly termed an uprising in contradiction of doubtful election results, but when observers identified the ethnic patterns to the violence, the comparisons to the Rwandan genocide poured fast through the intercontinental media. In both Kenya and Rwanda hate speech had been broadcast over local language radio and other media, yet among the many differences between the two conflicts was the extensive use of text messages to communicate hate in Kenya. This exploitation of new media quickly became emblematic of the Kenyan conflict. The mass media and scholarly attention to this shocking use of text messaging in the midst of violence perhaps over-emphasized the role it may have played in furthering the violence among Kenyans. Hate speech in its many forms--text messages, radio broadcasts, leaflets, and speeches certainly had multiple effects as the conflict unfolded; it likely incited individuals to use violence. However, as the numerous reports and commentaries on the election violence note, these instances of hateful speech should not be confused with the root causes of the Kenyan conflict, which lie in the disputed election, inequality, economic decline, and age-old conflicts over land and political power.[3]
The numerous reports by national and international organizations that document the threatening atmosphere and violence before, during, and after the election all mention the role of hate speech as a feature of the conflict. The rhetoric of politicians and political operatives prior to the election made it clear that voters should organize along ethnic lines and defend ethnic interests, a tactic also used in the 2002 election. The public discourse by leaders allowed voters to take for granted that ethnicity would be a significant factor in the elections. Some of the political rhetoric went beyond identifying groups and their interests to denigrating a particular ethnicity by using familiar stereotypes of their qualities or behaviors, such as laziness, acquisitiveness, and callousness.[4] The forms of hate speech may vary somewhat, but the bare essentials of the mechanism on which it rests and without which it loses its power are simple; one of them accommodates US, who are good, progressive, peace loving, endangered, the object of envy and conspiracy while the other is reserved for THEM, who are evil, backward, aggressive, menacing, forever plotting. Between these two categories there are no transitional forms or possibilities of a peaceful settlement: nuances and compromise are completely alien to the nature of hate speech. The group "US" has a legitimate right to power, riches, territories and all the rest, which is why "THEY," with their incomprehensible and illegal claims to some of that, must be discredited, and possibly destroyed.
This simple model has been in effect all the time since the outbreak of armed conflict in most Africa states. The category “US” in Rwanda was probably the Hutu pictured as patriots and guards of age-long hearths, innocent victims, a celestial people, and the like. In sharp contrast, but in harmony with the character of the Rwandan conflict, is the category “THEY” that was quite heterogeneous, accommodating the Tutsi, subsequently to be more or less selected and somewhat specified as cutthroat, fanatics, traitors and not worthy of humanity. This shows how language, usually thought of as reflecting existing reality, may under extraordinary circumstances anticipate future events.
Political speech-making and war marketing are surrounded by main areas of community life often soaked with evasive and euphemistic speech. As noted in our introductory remarks, this kind of language is heavily drawn upon in justification of one's own policies or actions, usually with the aim of putting a pretty mask on an ugly face. Joking about ethnicity is more common in some societies than others and can take different forms depending on the cultural and linguistic conventions that guide both humor and insult. In Cameroon, there is the fabled “come no go”[5] syndrome used in referring to non-ethnic immigrants. Kenyan humor is renowned.
Wordplay, and use of code-switching and accents frequently make fun using ethnic themes. Some Kenyan entertainers employ catchphrases such as son of the slopes[6] that, when uttered by others, could be heard either as ethnic smugness denouncing those not sharing an ethnic affiliation. Identical catchphrases move from in-group hilarity to out-group criticism or threat along a range tracking the speaker’s intention. This societal tendency inspires the intellect to probe whether to joke about ethnicity makes it stress-free to produce ethnic slurs or does it simply make it harder to identify the truly injurious expressions that promote violence? Such joking is certainly evidence that, in Kenya and elsewhere, people are capable of a variety of expressions about ethnicity, and that many of those fall short of hatred. To this extent euphemistic speech may be construed as a kind of inverse hate speech.
Generally speaking, euphemistic speech in the present context frequently has the effect of Orwellian doublespeak, characterized by the incongruity of what is said and what is done, one which replaces true communication with intentional confusion. For instance, calling people spots or weeds that needed to be cleansed or pulled out or referring to people as animals or insects.[7] Such uses of language offer a key warning sign that the groups might be poised for violence. But with respect to Kenya, hate speech has a rather shallow history. Strict dualistic oppositions have been relevant in certain moments or contexts, such as the famous rivalries between Kikuyu and Luo or Kalenjin and Kikuyu.[8] War propaganda being at least as old as modern warfare, it is not difficult to find telling examples of this variety of verbal manipulation.
Having contrasted hate speech and euphemistic speech, each taken individually and assigned to the same source group but aimed at different recipients, we may now ask whether it is possible to have two groups engaged in armed conflict, one of them emitting mostly euphemistic speech and the other returning fierce hate speech. At first blush it would seem that this typologically interesting possibility was plainly excluded in real-life situations — or at any rate that it would take a new and very special kind of conflict to admit it. As we know, conventional war implies two armies engaged in fighting, more or less face to face, with propaganda of both parties manipulating language in comparable ways, painting a black-and-white picture which extols the good boys on our side while demonizing the bad boys in the opposed camp. Such parallelism was also true of recent warfare.

IV. What next? Initiative at developing or building words that Heal
According to Fiona Lloyd, one careless word or one inaccurate detail can ignite a conflict. Equally, one clear, balance report can help to defuse tension and neutralize fear.[9] With the awareness of the impact of hate speech on the well-being of Africans and on development of the continent, attempts are being made to discourage such manners of communication. Most African Governments wants to introduce a "Prohibition of Hate Speech Bill"[10] with the aim of criminalizing hate speech, because the advocacy of hatred that is based on race, ethnicity, gender or religion constitutes incitement to cause harm. Surely no Christian would disagree, because hatred, except of evil and sin, is forbidden in the Scriptures. Jesus even said: "You have Heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy’. But I say to you,
‘Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.’"
[11] The envisaged Hate Speech bill is designed to complement a more comprehensive bill, namely the 'Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Bill. A transgressor will, on first conviction, be fined or imprisoned for up to 3 years, and on second conviction fined and/or imprisoned for up to six years. But it is likely to leave bitter resentment on the victims of this bill after they have served their punishment or paid their fines. More sustainably preferable measures have been and are in continuous adoption over time.
Peaceful means of communication have been developed and applied without resort to force. In the Democratic Republic of Congo, Radio Okapi: A voice of Dialogue set in 2002 provides accurate non-partisan information. Its programs promote the process of dialogue and peacebuilding. There are also academic initiatives that help in the understanding of conflict and their methods of emission. The Institute of War and Peace Reporting undertakes extensive training of journalist working in war zones.[12] In Cameroon the Faculty of Social Sciences and International Relations of the Protestant University of Central Africa offers degree and masters programs on Peace Journalism aimed at training professional who can inform with tact and impartiality. Nevertheless, the fellowship programs offered by the African Leadership Centre in collaboration with its partners are in line with the needs of transforming the manner in which events are handled to provide lasting peace.

V. Conclusion
There are many ways to say things or to communicate, some better than others. There are some people who seek to use their language in ways that will make exclusivity eminent for power and possession by drawing boundaries between themselves and other. On the other side there are those who seek to use their language to find a common ground among beliefs and needs, shared points of overlapping inclusivity and commonality as found in the efforts of individuals as Archbishop Desmond Tutu and the late president Nelson Mandela of South Africa in the last days of Apartheid. Further research by peace loving Africans should therefore be carried out with a vision of finding new ways to improve intercultural communication without the type of casualty witnessed in Rwanda in 1994


Notes 


[1] United States Holocaust Memorial Museum “Hate Speech and Group Targeted Violence: The Role of Speech in
Violent Conflict” Available at http://www.ushmm.org/genocide/spv.
[2] The Prosecutor v. Simon Bikindi, Case No. ICTR-01-72-T, Judgement and Sentence, 2 December 2008, para 15.
[3] Kiai, Maina. (this collection). Speech, Power, and Violence: Hate Speech and the Political Crisis in Kenya. http://allafrica.com/stories/200810240331.html 2007
[4] EU, Election Observation Mission. 2008. Kenya: Final Report General Elections 27 December 2007. European Union
[5] “Come no go” is in the Pidgin English parlance. It is the appellation of an infectious disease that infects man due to the dirtiness and unkempt nature of his environment. So the reference of people from other ethnic setting who find themselves within another cultural setting as “come no go” means these people are unfit for humanity and should not live among a superior race. Some time it simply means they have overstayed their welcome.
[6] The reference “son of the slopes” is a version of veiled ethnic joking used by the beloved Kenyan humorist and political activist, Wahome Mutahi, to raise consciousness about ethnocentrism and political oppression.
[7] Mwalongo, Rose. 2008. Spreading the `word of hate` in Kenya. Guardian, January 26, 2008
[8] Harnett-Sievers, Axel, and Ralph-Michael Peters. 2008. Kenya's 2007 General Election and its Aftershocks. Africa Spectrum 43 (1):133-144
[9] Fiona Lloyd. Training Manual Broadcasting from the frontline: skills, techniques and challenges for radio journalists.
[10] The draft 'Prohibition of Hate Speech Bill' and the 'Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Bill' are posted on the website of the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, www.doj.gov.za
[11]Matthew Chapter 5, verses 43-44. King James version.
[12]David, Alan, Regional Media in Conflict: Georgia, Cambodia, Bosnia, South Africa. Institute of War and Peace Reporting: London 2000

References
  • ·        David, Alan, Regional Media in Conflict: Georgia, Cambodia, Bosnia, South Africa. Institute of War and Peace Reporting: London 2000
  •     EU, Election Observation Mission. 2008. Kenya: Final Report General Elections 27 December 2007. European Union
  • ·     Fiona, Lloyd. Training Manual Broadcasting from the frontline: skills, techniques and challenges for radio journalists.
  • ·         Harnett-Sievers, Axel, and Ralph-Michael Peters. 2008. Kenya's 2007 General Election and its Aftershocks. Africa Spectrum 43 (1):133-144
  • ·       Kiai, Maina. (this collection). Speech, Power, and Violence: Hate Speech and the Political Crisis in Kenya. http://allafrica.com/stories/200810240331.html 2007
  • ·         Mwalongo, Rose. 2008. Spreading the `word of hate` in Kenya. Guardian, January 26, 2008
  • ·         The draft 'Prohibition of Hate Speech Bill' and the 'Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Bill' are posted on the website of the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, www.doj.gov.za
  • ·     The Prosecutor v. Simon Bikindi,Case No. ICTR-01-72-T, Judgement and Sentence, 2 December 2008, para 15.
  • ·         United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ―Hate Speech and Group Targeted Violence: The Role Of Speech in Violent Conflict Available at http://www.ushmm.org/genocide/spv.